If we could exclude a final scenario for City Council was held today, February 24, 2011, we chose what we have Unfortunately determined. And not because they were afraid because he could make more difficult the path to the referendum, but because the most ambiguous policy has shown once again.
Advisers, for most, have not read our letter, many have not read the newspapers in recent weeks, many - in our opinion - do not yet know the terms of the referendum and on autonomist. We discovered listening to some clumsy interventions, sometimes public and private times recorded at the coffee machine. What a mess! Nor do you expect a certain caliber of professionals: at one point represented. Calzolaro has simplified the referendum issue associated with that emphasized by the character from the screen of a tired TV promises "pilu for all" ... Nor do you expect the dr. Because is not positive, that's incredible, empowerment (which is fine) and referendum (there may be), but even opposed along with another couple of his colleagues to be able to speak in silent courtroom in advance of other issues on the agenda. Why?
But returning to what has been established, and "concluded" we can say that democracy came out of defeat, and so the constitutional principles, and also the sentiment of the people.
We believe that the entire Board bait defeated by what could be a chance for redemption with respect to spent too much time to consider a clear popular demand, even if, like white flies, someone dared to go against the tide: we act primarily Stellato of its initiative, and we thank the directors Larue and Basile to the transverse direction of democratic dignity expressed.
There 's been in the worst way, with the usual promises, "will review the matter within thirty days but before the Sixth Committee should deal with, but - the words of the director Fabrizio - a bad job in As an employee has lost his little pachidermico organic, and thus lengthen the time ... "" But we will see, we can "...
Someone tries to justify himself and does so with minimal elegance: "I was not there five years ago, I arrived only last year, I ...." How sad. What a deception. Even the intervention of Lucarelli, president of the District, was interrupted by actions of political and educational thinness, so as not to allow it to continue.
In short, it was the fair evanescence, where we saw the ghosts of the directors and advisors that are voted on Talsano-Lama-San Vito: Sometimes some of them laughed, some chewing gums of the bridge (non-rotating ), others came out and fell in long conversation on the phone while endeavoring sitting quietly in place, all others have shown that its electorate (because we are too) does not have a high regard. We will take account.
We, however, we citizens, we are separatists, we are good people, they go out heads held high. And we will continue our battle, because this has become. If the Lords of the policy are beyond comparison, take their time, come up with loopholes, all that people notice, we do not do electoral calculations and certainly do not endorse candidates or the next future.
We love our three Earths. Vuol dire che andremo avanti da soli: o meglio, mica tanto da soli poichè possiamo affermare che stavolta siamo ben più che in diecimila a crederci.
Ci rivediamo a Palazzo di Città fra trenta giorni: come da Voi promesso, signori Consiglieri.
MOVIMENTO PER L’AUTONOMIA DI TALSANO LAMA SAN VITO (Pasquale Musio) ASSOCIAZIONE TRETERRE (Costantino Liaci)
COMITATO SAN DOMENICO LAMA (Luigi Nuzzo)
0 comments:
Post a Comment